The Community of Acceptance

The search for community is often a long and hard one. We all desperately want, and need, to belong to something, somewhere, somehow, and yet we have also fought desperately for our freedom and are legitimately fearful of backsliding into group dynamics that suffocate individual expression and creativity. 

This, in essence, is the problem around the desire and need for both community and freedom, for arguably, we cannot have one without the other. The late 70’s and so called “me-generation” 80’s perhaps witnessed the apex of individualism in unbridled capitalism, the quest for endless sensation and experience, and ultimately (as Philip Slater entitled it) the pursuit of loneliness.  

Ironically, as the “glory of me” ideal was cracking through various forms of addiction, existential despair, and loss of will, the ideal of the commune was also falling apart. The construct of any collective willing to sacrifice the individual for its group mind was revealed as stultifying and oppressive.  And as one communal experiment after another grew up, and then disbanded, through the counter-culture, the challenges of our living together were painfully revealed. 

So the “Community of Acceptance” arises as both an ideal and a practice. As an ideal, it indicates an awareness of our need for one another, of our need to belong, while simultaneously remaining open to each person’s freedom to be exactly who they are. Ideals, such as this one, are admittedly utopian, but the practice of this ideal occurs on a regular basis, all over the planet, when we meet one another with intention and openness. Indeed, this is one of the factors that has kept me participating in and facilitating workshops. In workshops, and small focus groups, we come together, sometimes on an ongoing basis (actually getting to know one another) and become a group that can offer support on obvious (feedback, mirroring, etc.) and hidden (karmic connections, group releasing, etc.) levels.  At the same time, these groups are deliberately non-binding and work to respect the individuals in them, along with whatever group dynamic is taking place. This might be one of our best chances for avoiding shooting sprees and the like from people who have fallen through the cracks and have no other options for expressing their frustration. 

I remember one year I was offering a 5-day Creating the Work You Love seminar at Esalen Institute, and there was one male in the group who was constantly interrupting others, disturbing a number of the women, and generally being a nuisance. I asked the administrators of Esalen what they thought I should do. They replied that it was my workshop and I could do what I wanted, but that they strongly encouraged me to try and work with him. I tried. I never spoke to him about his behavior, but I did try to be as inclusive as possible. He remained. Our group remained intact, and at the end of the workshop, no less than four people thanked me for sticking with him, as he wound up contributing much to our process. Hence, a community of acceptance, as the practice of being together while also being apart – inconceivably and simultaneously one and different. 

RJ April 18, 2007

 

6 Responses to “The Community of Acceptance”

  1. Whitehawk Says:

    Well–I can’t help but respond to this topic, because it reminded me of a community I just recently learned about in the current issue of What Is Enlightenment magazine — the 1,000+ citizenship, multi-village phenom of Damanhur, in Italy. In fact, it’s technically the “Federation of Damanhur,” an esoteric eco-society that began in 1978, and includes vast, amazingly beautiful temples built into the mountains there (dug by hand with shovels and pickaxes, not dynamite). The entire living, unfolding and ongoing creation of this community was so interesting to learn about, I couldn’t begin to give a fair picture of it here. A portion of WIE’s expansive coverage of Damanhur is available free online at http://www.wie.org, for anyone interested in taking a gander. The article online is entitled, “Atlantis in the Mountains of Italy.”

    As tempting as it is to just gush on about this place, and its enduring co-creative activity (so many businesses, so much ART, so many considerations as people are nudged toward and supported in higher levels of their own creativity…), I will reign it in for now — interested parties can read one of the Damahur articles online, or better yet get the mag and read *all* the pieces about this place, and see the extraordinary photos, and ponder what they are pulling off there re: highly creative, intentional, expansive community… producing much of their own food, energy, fuel and EVEN minting their own money. What’s possibly most interesting of all is how they pull it off together, and how it thrives 30+ years after it began, and also the profile of the founder, Oberto Airaudi — all interesting stuff.

    This is an intriguing look into how people can push against “their natural leanings toward rigidity, security, and isolation, and seek real change, embrace uncertainty, and take personal responsibility for their own transformation.” Their commitment to living and creating fully in the NOW is exemplary. This whole issue of WIE looks at “utopia” — our timeless quest for heaven on earth. Quite a bundle to wrap my mind around… and much to ponder re: an amazing community made manifest. Whether its *really* Utopian on the inside, who could say. The writer of the article has some interesting observations; I recommend this issue of WIE as an adventure in ‘possibility’ if nothing else.

    Before signing off, I thought I’d comment on the annoying workshop guy Rick mentioned in his post, and how in the end people seemed appreciative of him, after all. This situation — familiar to us all I suspect — brings to mind the oyster, who has to deal with the irritation of sand getting into its shell… the end result being, of course, a pearl.

    Lauriel

  2. Rex Casteel Says:

    Mark Rudd, interviewed on KPFA’s Against The Grain, caught my attention when he differentiated between “activism” and “organizing.”

    He said that “activism” may or (more likely) may not generate any form of change in the world. The example he gave was “standing on the street corner with a protest sign in hand, day after day after day…”

    And he mentioned two essentials to successful organizing: the need for personal contact and the need to expand alliances beyond “like” entities.

    I offer these thoughts in order to further our discussion on the notion of community.

    I find myself thinking a lot about how we can use “all of this technology” to heal ourselves and help each other. Rudd’s words provide an interesting perspective for this contemplation.

    Peace,

    - R

  3. Wendy Says:

    Thanks for the posts on the Community of Acceptance. I agree that this is a difficult balance as I too find myself in one minute moving in to embrace a group and in the next, backing away because it is too demanding or restrictive.

    The point is well taken – both by Rick and by Rex – that we have to face the difficulties (the “problem people” and the dissimilar entities). My tendency is to want to get rid of them. I tend to think that they mess up the situation and impede progress. The posts remind me that often the problems or challenges are where my work lies. By working with them (and not just fighting them), there is genuine opportunity.

    Thanks to Lauriel for the information on Damanhur. I’d never heard of it before. I went online and read about it. While it seems so far away, both literally and figuratively, from the community in which I live, it’s good to know that it exists and appears to be successful.

  4. jeanie Says:

    Community of Acceptance.
    I keep coming back to your posts….and while I’ve read each of them at least a dozen times….I continue to come back every couple of days and read them again and again. I started a Thursday night group at my house (it’s a very small community with only 4 or 5) but I feel like we’ve taken action…..but I know there’s so much more here.

    I would love to hear more about your views/ideas/feelings….it’s pulling me so strongly, but I feel very inarticulate when I try to talk about it?! So PLEASE….post more on this one!

    And thanks for sharing on Damanhur and Rudd….learning about both of them has opened up new pathways for me.

  5. Jindrich Says:

    I am a big fan of Damanhur, http://www.damanhur.info. I just met two Damanhuriens, Esperide Ananas and Crotalo Sesamo, at New Life Expo in San Francisco four weeks ago with their presentation about this unusual group of “practical dreamers” and bought their new DVD
    The Great Adventure, ~
    39 minutes of stunning images and music of the Federation of Damanhur, a world renowned center for spiritual, social and artistic research, plus an amaizing visual journey inside the Temples of Humankind, the extraordinary underground work of art built by the citizens of Damanhur.
    ************
    29-30 June - 1 July 2007 - ICSA Conference at Damanhur
    “Communities”: Yesterday’s Utopia ~ Today’s Reality
    ************
    Let’s spread the news around

  6. SahliasmalPic Says:

    Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others.

    The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex.

    The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat.

    The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different.

    It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.

Leave a Reply